Archive for » June 8th, 2012«

Mental health hearing ordered in deadly arson case

A doctor will determine whether a Riverside woman is mentally competent to face trial on charges of setting a fire that killed her father.

The Riverside Press-Enterprise ( http://bit.ly/NSa9I2) says a judge on Thursday suspended criminal proceedings against Deborah Clark and set a hearing for her in mental health court.

The 48-year-old had encephalitis at age 2 and her brothers say she has the mental ability of a 6-year-old.

She lived with her parents. Relatives say she had burned some of their religious books because they made her sad.

She’s charged with murder, arson and elder abuse in connection with an April fire that killed her father.

Her mother was injured and later died. She already was terminally ill and the cause of her death hasn’t been announced.


Similar news:
Category: Mental Health  Tags: ,  Comments off

Donations to Key Cuomo Ally Show a Rift Among Unions

But the committee turns out to have another source of money: a group of building trade unions who contributed $500,000 last year. Their decision to back Mr. Cuomo — and help finance an offensive against their public-sector brethren — illuminates a deepening fissure in the labor movement.

Labor officials said the union contributions to the business group in 2011, which were revealed in records filed with the federal Labor Department and interviews with people familiar with the donations, reflected workers’ deep unease about a slowdown in the construction industry in New York and their hope that Mr. Cuomo and the business committee could persuade voters and lawmakers to support publicly financed building projects and encourage growth.

But the unions’ aid to the business coalition also shows how battles over government spending, especially at the state level, have deepened longstanding tensions in the labor movement between union members employed by government and those employed by private business.

Public unions are the focus of intense attacks from Republicans, including the wealthy conservative donors whose millions of dollars helped Gov. Scott Walker defeat a labor-backed recall effort in Wisconsin this week. But as states struggle with declining tax revenues, and as gridlock in Washington leaves little prospect for additional federal aid to states, the alliance among Mr. Cuomo, the Committee to Save New York and the private unions reflects a new level of complexity to labor’s plight. Even as unions face off against Republican opponents, they are also often at war with a prominent Democratic governor, who has conquered Albany in part by dividing labor in the country’s most unionized state.

“I think that any efforts to split the labor movement, whether it’s Democrats or Republicans, are unwelcome and not helpful to long-run stability in the state,” said Michael Podhorzer, the political director for the A.F.L.-C.I.O. “I think that ‘exploit’ is the right word,” he added. “You could see in the Walker recall that the labor movement remained very unified.”

The unions contributing to the Committee to Save New York included the Mason Tenders’ District Council, which oversees local laborers’ unions in New York City, as well as affiliates of the Laborers Eastern Region, an organization of laborers unions in New York City, New Jersey and Delaware. Gary LaBarbera, president of the Building and Construction Trades Council of Greater New York, sits on the committee’s advisory board.

The council joined “because we believed it was important to support the governor’s agenda of bringing fiscal responsibility to New York and attracting private investment and job creation to our state,” said Paul Fernandes, a spokesman for Mr. LaBarbera.

“It should come as no surprise,” he continued, “that we would want to work with other civic and business leaders to support efforts to get our state on sound fiscal and economic footing.”

One labor official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the unions’ decision, said that unlike public workers, union members in the building trades — electricians, construction workers and plumbers — could not qualify for benefits unless there was private sector work to be had.

“We don’t have pension funds if our members are not working,” the official said. “We don’t have health insurance if our workers are not working.”

The construction unions are closely aligned with the real estate industry, which is a major source of donations for the committee and Mr. Cuomo. The committee, which raised $17 million last year, also received $2.4 million from gambling interests, including Genting, a company seeking to build a major casino in New York.

“Our leadership has had long relationships with building trades for many, many years,” said Michael McKeon, a spokesman for the committee. “And that is fully consistent with the mission of the Committee to Save New York.”

Mr. Cuomo’s ties to the laborers’ union are deep. Maggie Moran, while working as a top official at the regional union, was a senior adviser to his 2010 campaign. She remained an executive at the laborers’ union until January, during the period when the unions made their contributions to the Committee to Save New York. Ms. Moran declined to comment on Thursday.

While some unions, including the Civil Service Employees Association, withheld their endorsement of Mr. Cuomo, the Mason Tenders and other trade unions delivered foot soldiers on Election Day. When Mr. Cuomo gave his victory speech on Election Day in 2010, he thanked Ms. Moran and the laborers by name.

Mr. Cuomo has adopted a tough posture, rhetorically and legislatively, toward unions, but has also sought to work with them. Unlike Mr. Walker, in Wisconsin, Mr. Cuomo did not seek to strip public unions of their collective bargaining rights.

“Our philosophy is that it’s not a question of labor or business interests,” said Richard Bamberger, a Cuomo spokesman. “It’s both or neither.”

Last summer, Mr. Cuomo demanded that New York’s public sector unions, including the largest, the Civil Service Employees Association, accept major wage and benefit concessions as part of a deal to rein in state spending, and he warned of sweeping layoffs if they refused.

In February, Mr. Cuomo used the threat of his emergency budget power to force teachers’ unions to accept a more rigorous system of classroom evaluations. And in March, backed by millions of dollars in advertising from the Committee to Save New York, Mr. Cuomo persuaded lawmakers to cut pensions for future public employees in New York City and across the state, prompting unhappy unions to boycott an annual conference of black and Latino lawmakers.

A person with knowledge of the committee’s deliberations said Mr. LaBarbera had sought to scale back more aggressive advertising attacks that had been under consideration.

Even as Mr. Cuomo and the committee pushed for concessions from public sector unions, they have promoted public works proposals that would benefit members of the construction unions, including significant spending on economic development and infrastructure projects.

In March, Mr. Cuomo announced an agreement on the centerpiece of his jobs program: the New York Works Task Force, with a mandate to raise and invest billions of dollars to rebuild the state’s roads, bridges and parks, and create tens of thousands of jobs. Both union leaders and the Committee to Save New York praised the infrastructure spending.

“It’s worked,” Mr. McKeon said of the committee’s efforts. “The New York Works program is a success.”


Similar news:
Category: Donations  Tags: ,  Comments off

Invasion of the Charity Snatchers!

As the tax-code debate heats up this election season, one cherished break for taxpayers in upper brackets—the deduction for charitable contributions—is under fire from all sides. Not only are tax overhaulers on both sides of the congressional aisle taking aim, but so are both presidential candidates.

That means well-heeled donors should consider whether to accelerate donations planned for future years into 2012, while the tax treatment is still favorable. “We’re raising this question with all our clients,” says Beth Kaufman, an attorney at Caplin Drysdale in Washington.

The threat is shining a new spotlight on “donor-advised funds,” which allow donors to give and deduct at current tax rates, while making charitable gifts later. In effect, they are miniature versions of private foundations—but without the considerable expenses or hassles. They also are a rare example of a tax-favored vehicle that can work equally well for the wealthy and the merely affluent.

“It amazes me that my clients with tens or hundreds of millions of dollars are using the same techniques and investments I would” for charitable giving, Ms. Kaufman says.

The mechanics are straightforward. A donor-advised fund is an individual account held under the umbrella of one large tax-exempt organization. Donors contribute and deduct immediately and then invest the money in the account, which gains tax-free. Later, even years later, donors ask the umbrella group to make grants from their fund to one or more tax-exempt charities of their choice.

The minimum to open an account can be $5,000 or even lower, with minimum grants as low as $50 a pop. There usually aren’t any limits on maximum grants.

Donor-advised funds aren’t right for everyone. Accounts have administrative and investment fees that can eat up 0.7% of assets a year and sometimes much more. And the funds require giving up ownership of the contributed assets—a tough sell for some donors.

Nonetheless, with an estimated $40 billion of assets spread among 2,300 sponsoring groups, according to Benjamin Pierce, head of Vanguard Group’s charitable arm, donor-advised funds are rising rapidly. At three large providers—Fidelity Investments, Charles Schwab

and Vanguard—assets have more than quadrupled over the last decade, to $13 billion, despite lackluster stock-market growth.

Marc Schindler, a financial planner in Houston who, with his wife, has had a donor-advised fund with the Houston Jewish Community Foundation for more than a decade, says he plans to raise his contribution by 50% this year. “I think a lot of tax deductions will be going away in the future, given the tremendous budget deficit,” he says.

Tax Appeal

At the heart of these funds’ appeal is one of the tax code’s best breaks, for people who want to donate: Givers get a full deduction for contributions of assets held for more than a year that have increased in value, while skipping capital-gains tax. The current capital-gains rate is 15% for the highest earners.

“You can give more if you do it the right way,” says Zach Gerger, a retired anesthesiologist in Charlotte, N.C., who has had a donor-advised fund for more than a decade.

Here is why: Say an investor has shares he acquired more than 20 years ago for $5,000. Now their value is $40,000, and he would like to give that amount to a dozen favorite causes. If he sells the stock and donates the proceeds, he will owe capital-gains tax of $5,250, leaving him with $34,750 to give and deduct.

But if he gives the stock instead, he can deduct the entire $40,000 (assuming other tax limits don’t kick in). If he still likes the stock, he can use $40,000 of cash to replace it and come out ahead (assuming he intended to give in the first place).

He could, of course, get the same tax benefit—minus account fees—by giving shares directly to tax-exempt groups. But some of them (say, a small church or a walk-a-thon) can’t handle noncash contributions. In addition, he might want to spread out the gifts over many years, or donate an amount smaller than a single share of his stock.

Some advisers have integrated donor-advised funds into their clients’ overall strategies. Bert Whitehead, a planner in Franklin, Mich., says he has several clients who regularly contribute shares of their most highly appreciated stocks to these funds and never write donation checks for cash.

Laura Peebles, a nonprofit specialist at Deloitte Tax in Washington, suggests donor-advised funds for clients who tend to lose their letters confirming donations. “That gives them only one document a year to track,” she says.

These funds can offer other benefits as well. Dr. Gerger used his fund to help teach his children his philosophy of giving when they were young. Every year they got the chance to choose a charity to receive a grant, after doing research and making a case. “My daughter always picked animal charities,” he says.

Donor-advised funds vary widely, however. If you are thinking of going this route, here is what to do:

Know the different types of sponsors. The sponsor is the tax-exempt umbrella group holding the donor-advised funds, and there are different types. The first ones on the scene, some before World War II, were “community” trusts or foundations. These sponsors are likely to have a local or regional focus and often vet and work closely with charities.

Then there are donor-advised funds sponsored by “single-issue” or specialty groups, such as the Jewish Federations or WaterStone. Two such groups, the King Baudouin Foundation United States and CAFAmerica, specialize in funds that make tax-deductible donations to groups abroad.

The fastest-growing segment are donor-advised funds sponsored by “national” charities. Many are offered by financial institutions such as Fidelity, Vanguard or Schwab, but others are stand-alones, such as the National Philanthropic Trust. These sponsors typically impose far fewer restrictions on donors but are less in touch with the charities they give to.

Determine the sponsor’s grant-making policies. Once a giver contributes an asset to a donor-advised fund, he or she no longer controls the money. Technically, the donor requests that the sponsor make a gift of a certain amount, and then sponsor decides whether to make it.

Sponsors vet grant requests to make sure the group is tax-exempt under Internal Revenue Service rules. But some—including many of the national charities such as Fidelity, Vanguard and Schwab—typically honor all donor requests to legitimate U.S. charities.

Community foundations and single-issue sponsors sometimes deny requests for grants outside their purview. They also might ask for a contribution to the umbrella organization’s general fund in return for honoring other requests. If that happens, “make sure to negotiate such issues before setting up an account,” says Joe McDonald, an attorney at McDonald Kanyuk in Concord, N.H., who advises wealthy donors.

Also, ask about the sponsor’s minimum grant amount. It is as low as $50 at some sponsors, but much higher at others.

Compare account minimums, fees, investment options and assets accepted. They vary widely, especially among community foundations and single-issue sponsors.

As a benchmark, Fidelity and Schwab accept minimums as low as $5,000 from one donor, while at Vanguard the minimum is $25,000. All three charge an annual administrative fee of 0.6% on accounts $500,000 and under, which drops as the amount in the fund increases.

At these three sponsors, donors with smaller accounts—under $250,000—choose among investment pools rather than a mix individual funds or stocks. Fees vary, from less than 0.1% to 10 times that or more.

The most popular assets contributed to donor-advised funds are cash and securities, but some sponsors accept nontraded assets if there is a way to sell them. As with other financial accounts, the more a donor contributes, the greater the latitude and hand-holding he or she receives.

Check out the sponsor. If the sponsor founders, so could your account. In 2009, an organization known as the National Heritage Foundation went bankrupt. A court ruled that $25 million in 9,000 donor-advised funds was available to pay creditors, wiping out the accounts.

All charities sponsoring donor-advised funds have to file a Form 990 with the IRS, a revealing if complex document. Large donors might want to ask for audited financial statements as well, Ms. Peebles says: “If a group doesn’t have them, it’s a red flag.”

Find out about portability. If you are unhappy with your sponsor, can you move the account to another one? There isn’t a uniform policy. Fidelity, Schwab, and Vanguard all allow transfers, while some community foundations or trusts and single-issue sponsors don’t. Ask before you give.

Understand the end game. Some sponsors don’t allow accounts to survive the original donor and put remaining assets in their general charitable fund. Others allow the donor to name one or more successors to decide donations until the account is empty.

These funds aren’t perfect—but when used properly they can help you maximize your tax breaks and minimize giving headaches.

—Email: taxreport@wsj.com

Write to Laura Saunders at taxreport@wsj.com


Similar news:
Category: Charities  Tags: ,  Comments off

Doctor talks about designer drugs at mental health event in Dearborn VIDEO

News







<!–

–>

DEARBORN – Dr. Manuel Tancer spoke about “designer drugs” during a mental health forum May 24 at the Henry Ford Centennial Library.

These drugs, which go by the names K2, Spice and Kush, among others, “mimic” the effects of the hallucinogens like those found in marijuana, Tancer said. He said the effects of their use can include increased heart rate and blood pressure, paranoia and panic attacks and can contribute to psychotic symptoms.

“They’re not the safe herbal preparations people like to believe,” Tancer said.

The Drug Enforcement Administration has made them Schedule I drugs, which marks them as drugs without medical use. Other substances on this tier include heroin and LSD, Tancer said.

A set of bills currently up for debate in Lansing would ban the sale and possession of such drugs if passed.

  • 1
  • See Full Story










Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
comments powered by Disqus


Similar news:

New CEO of Rogers Behavioral Health System Announced

/PRNewswire/ — The Board of Directors at Rogers Behavioral Health System, Inc. has announced that Patrick (Pat) Hammer has accepted the position as President and CEO. Hammer will officially take the helm when current President and CEO, David L. Mouthrop, Ph.D., retires at the end of August, 2012.

Moulthrop, who has been with Rogers Memorial Hospital since 1993, submitted his retirement plans to the Board in 2011 and has been helping to coordinate efforts to assure a smooth transition. “Pat will arrive here July 9 and begin his orientation,” Moulthrop said. “We are eager to begin the collaboration to ensure a seamless transition that benefits our patients and staff.”

According to W. Carl Templer, System Board President, there were over 500 candidates who sought the prestigious position. “We narrowed the search down to three of the most qualified,” he said. “We believe that Pat will be an asset to Rogers and will build upon the legacy that Dave began. No doubt he will add some of his own vision and talents to the organization.”

Looking Forward to the Possibilities Hammer said he is humbled and honored by the offer to join the staff at Rogers Behavioral Health System. “Rogers has a well-known tradition of providing outstanding care, and I am looking forward to working with Dave. I consider him one of the top behavioral health leaders in the country.”

With over 20 years of experience in behavioral health operations, strategic planning and motivational leadership, Hammer says he is passionate about helping people to recover from mental illness and addiction. “Rogers Behavioral Health System has such a strong tradition of providing outstanding patient care services.”

Hammer’s first priority is to help ensure that the change in leadership goes smoothly by working with Moulthrop “to build collaborative working relationships with the medical staff, senior leadership team and employees.”  He added that his ultimate goal is “to help Rogers Behavioral Health System build upon its reputation of high-quality care within the region and become the nationally recognized leader for providing highly specialized psychiatric and addiction treatment services.”

A Smooth Transition Plans have always included an overlapping period of time so that the new CEO could benefit from Moulthrop’s experience at Rogers. “There’s no doubt Dave will remain a valued resource even after he retires,” Templer continued, “but he has planned for time with Pat so that he can make the change easier for our patients, families, employees and community.”

Once Hammer arrives July 9, he will begin his orientation with Moulthrop and the rest of the team. Effective August 1, he will take his position as CEO, with Moulthrop continuing to act as consultant until August 30. After that, Moulthrop will step down and continue to consult when needed.

“We are thankful for Dave’s legacy,” Templer continued. “When he got here, Rogers was losing money and in danger of closing its doors. We had only a few patients and one location. Since he came here almost 20 years ago, we have two major hospital campuses in Oconomowoc and Milwaukee, along with three other locations in Madison, Kenosha and Brown Deer.  We have more than 900 talented employees and close to 9,500 individuals who have received our services this year. Dave has taken us from a small, regional hospital to a much larger power as a mental health organization. He’s definitely played an important role in Rogers’ history and on the national scene. When he leaves his position as CEO, we will continue to wish him the best as he enjoys a new chapter of his life.”

Rogers Memorial Hospital is currently ranked #7 in the country for mental health services. As president/CEO, Moulthrop has helped to oversee five key system components: Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.; Rogers Partners in Behavioral Health, LLC; Rogers Center for Research and Training; Rogers InHealth: and Rogers Memorial Hospital Foundation, Inc. Under his leadership, the hospital has become nationally recognized for its specialized residential treatment services and affiliations with academic institutions and teaching hospitals in the area. Rogers Memorial Hospital is currently Wisconsin’s largest not-for-profit, private behavioral health hospital, providing adults, children and adolescents with treatment for eating disorders, chemical dependency, obsessive-compulsive and anxiety disorders, as well as a variety of child and adolescent mental health concerns.  For more information, please visit www.rogershospital.org.

For additional information or to set up an interview, please contact Jody Miller, Director of Marketing, at (262) 646-1310.

SOURCE Rogers Behavioral Health System, Inc.


Similar news:
Category: Mental Health  Tags: ,  Comments off

Company agrees to resume donating food to Richmond

Town Administrator Steve Sette tells The Westerly Sun ( http://bit.ly/Mn1dv3) the issue was resolved in a meeting last week with Jim Lynch, president and CEO of Dan’s Management Company, a franchise that runs 35 Dunkin’ Donuts stores in the state.


Similar news:
Category: Donations  Tags: ,  Comments off

Treasurer: Charity money missing

An organization responsible for holding and distributing donations for Tracy-area charities does not have the money to hand out, according to the local man who keeps track of the account.

Tri-Valley Community Foundation acts as a conservator of money set aside for Tracy-area charities by GWF Energy, operator of the power plant west of the city.

According to GWF spokesman Riley Jones, the company gave $55,000 a year beginning in 2003 for the use of organizations such as Tracy Interfaith Ministries, McHenry House Family Shelter and Boys Girls Clubs of Tracy, with Tri-Valley as intermediary. GWF also established a $200,000 trust fund for use after 2013, when its annual contributions would cease.

Tri-Valley holds the money and confirms that the planned recipients are qualified nonprofits.

It writes the checks when asked to distribute the money.

But according to Gene Birk, the treasurer for the 12-person committee in Tracy that helps decide which charities benefit from the GWF fund, none of the money that should be in the account is there.

“There is no money,” Birk said Monday, June 4. “Though according to my financial statement, we have $243,000.”

Birk said he discovered the discrepancy last week, when he requested two $2,500 checks destined for high school seniors as scholarships.

When Tri-Valley was asked for the money on behalf of the Tracy GWF community committee, Birk said he was told the checks couldn’t be cut.

Jones, who sits in on the committee meetings, called Birk’s news a surprise.

“Our last meeting was in May, and I had the latest financial document, and it showed for the year all of the deposits and all of the withdrawals and showed what our balance was,” Jones said Monday.

“I don’t know that the money isn’t there, nor do I know if it is there,” he continued. “All I know is I have the financial (statement) saying the money is there.”

Jones said Monday that he had not received an audit and an updated balance statement he requested about three weeks ago.

If the money remains unaccounted for, charities like Tracy Interfaith could be left in the lurch.

Darlene Quinn, the director of Tracy Interfaith, said her nonprofit was counting on $18,000 this year from the GWF fund.

“We just heard that last month that had been approved,” Quinn said. “It’s a big hit. The money that we have got from the GWF has been used primarily for helping people with (Pacific Gas Electric Co.), water, rent, funerals — all kinds of assistance of that type of nature.”

She said the news came at an especially bad time, as demand for help continues to increase. Tracy Interfaith had 1,700 people interview for assistance in May, an increase of more than 200 people from May 2011.

“It’s not getting better,” she said.

Jones added Thursday that Tri-Valley’s acting director, retired Superior Court judge Ron Hyde, was working with GWF to sort out the problem so the money could be distributed.

Hyde took over as acting director of the organization when former director David Rice was ousted by the board, according to a May 31 report by the Pleasanton Weekly.

Messages left for Hyde with a Tri-Valley receptionist on Monday and Thursday were not returned before deadline.

According to the same report from the Pleasanton Weekly, Tri-Valley tax documents showed that the organization spent more money than it took in starting in 2006, and the organization spent $445,000 more than it had during the 2009-10 fiscal year.

Jones said GWF likely wasn’t the only company affected.

The Pleasanton Weekly also reported that Livermore’s Sandia National Laboratories decided to withdraw its business from Tri-Valley, and other outfits could do the same.

Jones did not elaborate about any future action GWF might take.

“All I can tell you is that, at this point, we’re not sure which direction everything is going to go,” Jones said. “There are insurance companies involved.”

Birk said he was most disappointed for the new high school graduates who expected scholarships. He is considering setting up a separate fund to raise money for the students.

“All of a sudden I have to call and say, ‘I don’t have $2,500,’” Birk said, his voice heavy with emotion. “I want this girl to go to school. I was crying last night at home to my wife, and I was telling her, ‘It’s not fair.’”


Similar news:
Category: Charities  Tags: ,  Comments off

A bright future for mental health in Australia


Find More Stories

8 June 2012

A bright future for mental health in Australia

13
Comments


Mark Butler

A little over 12 months ago, the Government outlined the largest ever package of new Mental Health initiatives, amounting to $2.2 billion.

The package followed months of intensive engagement with experts, service providers, consumers and carers – and overwhelmingly reflected their advice.

Twelve months on, we’ve established the National Mental Health Commission which is busy developing the first National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Report Card. We’ve almost finished opening the doors to 10 new headspace centres for 12-25-year-olds with 15 more in progress and 15 more locations to be announced in coming weeks.

A few months ago, the Government signed off with state and territory governments to provide $200 million in funding for innovative projects supporting people with severe and chronic mental illness – with a particular focus on hospital avoidance and stable housing. We’re in the final stage of the first round of funding with the state and territory governments to establish EPPIC centres which provide support to teenagers and young adults with early episodes of psychosis.

The Government has overhauled our approach to mental health services over the internet (e-mental health), and with expanded Personal Helpers and Mentors (PHAMs) and respite services for consumers and carers.

Medicare locals have received huge increases in funding to provide counselling services to “hard to reach” groups, including young families and Indigenous Australians. There has also been a huge expansion of the Kidsmatter program and the development of a healthy kids check to help drive good emotional and social development in children.

We are in the final stages of rolling out a revolutionary program (Partners in Recovery) which provides coordinated support to the most severely and chronically unwell in our community, a program worth $550 million. And there has been a dramatic expansion in funding for suicide prevention services.

This package, both in its size and its scope, well and truly delivers on the Prime Minister’s pre-election commitment to make mental health reform a priority for this term of government.

So I was, frankly, gobsmacked to read a staff member of the Mental Health Council of Australia describe that commitment as having become a “casualty” in the 2012 budget – gobsmacked that it has escaped attention that the largest ever mental health package was not touched in the slightest by this year’s budget.

The authors appear to have fallen victim to the rhetoric and, in some cases, misleading commentary on this year’s funding for the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program (MHNIP). The article published on The Drum on June 6 describes the budget decision as a “cut” and quotes one psychiatrist talking about “losing the MHNIP”. The article conveniently neglects to mention that the budget provides $16.5 million in additional, new funding for MHNIP in 2012/13, increasing that year’s base funding from $19.1 million to $35.6 million.

I appreciate that the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses wanted the Government to provide an uncapped provision for MHNIP – effectively a blank cheque – but no other program in mental health (except Better Access) is funded on that basis – every other program is funded for a certain dollar amount based on a certain level of activity.

The funding for 2012/13 will allow the MHNIP to service many more patients than was forecast when the program was introduced in 2007. Later this year a formal evaluation of the program will be received which will allow the Government to make longer-term decisions about its future.

While I haven’t yet received that evaluation, I do agree that the MHNIP is a valuable program – which is why we found additional money for it in a tight budget. But I completely disagree with the approach taken by the authors of this article.

Mental health nurses are a critical part of our mental health system in a wide variety of settings. Many of the reforms currently being rolled out are well suited to the skills of nurses, who will be in high demand to staff them. The hysterical language being employed in this article doesn’t do any justice to the writers’ cause – or to the bright future that mental health nurses have in Australia.

Mark Butler is the Federal Minister for Mental Health and Ageing. View his full profile here.


Similar news:
Category: Mental Health  Tags: ,  Comments off

Outpouring of donations for Rockaway family who lost son

Tammy Benitez thought her son could beat the odds.

Christian Benitez, a precocious teenager who dreamed of serving in the military, suffered since birth from numerous heart defects but never let it hamper his blossoming social life.

The 13-year-old loved skateboarding and drawing and he would strike up conversations with the elders of his Rockaway neighborhood.

“I used to call him the Mayor of Rockaway,” his mom told the Daily News. “He was just so, so smart.”

Christian’s uphill climb through life came to an abrupt halt when he went into cardiac arrest at the beach on Memorial Day. He battled for a week in the hospital, but he was pronounced dead Monday.

“He was just so full of life,” Tammy Benitez said, holding back tears. “It’s going to be hard for us — we’re the ones left behind. He’s in a good place now.”

When Christian was an infant, doctors told the mother of three that considering Christian’s ailments, he would live until his seventh birthday.

“When kids are ill they grow up a lot quicker,” said Benitez, 41. “They’re just so profound and they just look at life differently.”

Before she could come to terms with losing her youngest child, the mounting bills to bury him were a more immediate concern, said Benitez, a Stop Shop employee.

Enter the often tight-knit Rockaway community, which sprung into action when they heard about the family’s plight.

“Word gets out real quick even without the social networks,” said Steve Stathis, president of the Graybeards, a local nonprofit group that donated $5,000 to the Benitez family.

Fliers began circulating throughout the peninsula and local organizations began chipping in hundreds of dollars toward burial expenses.

Within a few days of Christian’s tragic death, a majority of the expenses were covered, Benitez said.

“There are still donations coming in,” she said. “The people are so generous.”

Officials with the Denis S. O’Connor Funeral Home, which has been handling arrangements for the family, said they’ve seen support from Far Rockaway to Breezy Point.

“There’s been an outpouring of generosity from every corner of the community,” said owner Vincent O’Connor. “It’s always so tragic when someone so young passes away.”

Christian’s wake was on Thursday at the Rockaway funeral home and his funeral is planned for Friday.

Benitez takes solace in the fact that little Christian lived almost twice as long as doctors originally projected.

“I was very fortunate to have him for that time,” she said. “I was very lucky.”

On the day of Christian’s wake Benitez said that she is overcome with gratitude that people she may never meet helped her son get a proper burial.

Christian may have not been able to overcome the odds, but the local support exceeded her wildest expectations.

“How do you even put into words to thank people?” she asked. “It’s two simple words but I don’t think it’s enough.”

idejohn@nydailynews.com


Similar news:
Category: Donations  Tags: ,  Comments off
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Twitter