Archive for » April, 2012 «

Chicago Mental Health Cuts: Protesters Occupy City Hall On Day Of Planned …

Woodlawn Chicago Mental Health Center Rahm Emanuel

As the city prepared to close three more mental health clinics Monday, Chicago mental health advocates protested outside Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s City Hall office.

According to the Mental Health Movement, the coalition leading ongoing protests against the mayor’s clinic consolidation plan, Chicago’s City Hall will close earlier than usual — at 4:30 p.m Monday — ahead of a press conference advocates had slated for 5:15 p.m. The group instructed those interested in participating in the press conference to arrive before 4:30 and proceed to the building’s fifth floor.

(Follow Monday’s occupation live here.)

The group reports that one demonstrator was arrested earlier Monday during the demonstration in the lobby outside the mayor’s office. WGN notes that protesters have said they are prepared to stay put in City Hall for days to bring additional awareness to the city’s plan. They are demanding that the city clinics remain open, public and fully funded.

Earlier Monday, the group protested outside both Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn’s office and President Obama’s 2012 campaign headquarters in downtown Chicago.

Outside Obama’s Prudential Plaza campaign office, some four dozen advocates protested and delivered a leader to the president seeking a “pardon” from the cuts they say will have a devastating impact on the clinics’ clients. The clinics are slated for closure by the end of the day Monday.

Shame on Rahm Emanuel for possibly hurting the president’s plans for universal health care, by him denying health care to the poor and the mentally ill,” N’Dana Carter, a protester and clinic of a city-run clinic, told CBS Chicago.

Emanuel has been unrelenting in his consolidation plan, which the city claims will save it some $3 million, with one minor exception. Progress Illinois notes that the mayor’s office confirmed Monday that the Woodlawn Mental Health Center would now remain open — though only as a “satellite office” staffed by two therapists.

That change may have come after several individuals in the city for the World Summit of Nobel Peace Laureates visited the Woodlawn clinic, the site of an ongoing protest against the cuts, last Thursday morning.

Ingeborg Breines, co-director of the Nobel Prize-winning International Peace Bureau, and Shan Cretin, chair of the Nobel Prize-winning American Friends Service Committee, both urged the city to halt its clinic closure plan.

“Chicago is able to raise the funds to sponsor showcase events like the Nobel Laureate Summit or the upcoming NATO meeting,” Cretin said. “I urge the mayor to be equally energetic in finding the funds to support the community mental health centers.”

After a series of protests before the closures, Mental Health Movement activists barricaded themselves inside the Woodlawn clinic as its shutdown deadline neared. After police secured the clinic, the protest moved outside, where demonstrators have been camped for 14 days, despite pressure from police to leave. Thirty arrests were reported during the occupation.

Dr. Bechara Choucair of the Chicago Department of Public Health, has argued that all displaced patients will continue to have access to quality care, but the Mental Health Movement said the consolidations will prevent some people from seeing their doctors or getting their medications. Further, they argue that the cuts have already meant that 18 patients who no longer can receive mental health care in their neighborhoods have been hospitalized or admitted to the psychiatric ward.

Last Tuesday, Emanuel claimed that the cuts will actually improve the mental health services Chicago offers, and the city will offer a CTA card for the first month to help ease the financial burden of longer commutes to access services.

We’re actually adding patients who were denied service because we didn’t have the resources,” Emanuel told the Chicago Sun-Times. “Now, I understand peoples’ protests. They have a right to do that. If there was an arrest dealing with trespassing for other issues, I’ll look into it. But, I want people to remember: I take the issue of providing benefits and care to those who need mental health benefits seriously.”

WATCH mental health advocates speak with Chicago police during the Woodlawn clinic occupation earlier this month:

See photos from the Woodlawn Mental Health Center occupation, below, courtesy of Margo Elena Mejia and HuffPost blogger Mark Cassello:

READ WHOLE POST







“;
var coords = [-5, -72];
// display fb-bubble
FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, ‘top’, {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: ‘clear-overlay’});
});


Similar news:
Category: Mental Health  Tags: ,  Comments off

What a Dearth of Small Donations May Mean for Romney

The fund-raising apparatus powering President Obama’s re-election effort has struggled to attract the big-money donors who contributed to Mr. Obama’s record fund-raising haul in 2008.

Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, faces the mirror-opposite problem: the bulk of his campaign’s war chest has been built big check by big check, while small donations — defined as contributions of less than $200 — have been scarce, according to Federal Election Commission data compiled and analyzed by Derek Willis of The New York Times.

More than half of Mr. Obama’s fund-raising total has arrived in donations of less than $200. Just 13 percent of Mr. Romney’s fund-raising has come in such small denominations. Instead, a majority of the money Mr. Romney has raised arrived $2,500 at a time, the maximum campaign donation allowed for either the primary or the general election (an individual can contribute $2,500 to a candidate’s primary campaign and another $2,500 to the general election campaign).


Note: the above percentages apply to the total amount of money raised by each campaign, not the number of donations.

Mr. Obama has raised roughly $193 million; 19 percent of that sum, or $36.6 million, came from donations of $2,500. Of the $87 million the Romney campaign has raised, 57 percent, or $49.3 million, came in $2,500 chunks.

Of course, a dollar is a dollar, whether it reaches a campaign’s coffers alone or accompanied by 2,499 compatriots. And while Mr. Obama has raised significantly more money than Mr. Romney so far, the general election is just beginning. Moreover, spending by Republican-leaning “super PACs” is expected to far exceed spending by Democratic ones.

For the Romney campaign, however, a paucity of small-dollar donations is inauspicious not because it means that it will have trouble raising enough money (it probably won’t, and if it does, Mr. Romney has considerable personal wealth at his disposal). Rather, a lack of small-dollar donors could indicate tepid support for Mr. Romney among the Republican base.

Research by Adam Bonica of the political science department at Stanford University suggests that small donations tend to come from the wings of the ideological spectrum. For Mr. Romney, donations of less than $200 would most likely come from the most conservative camp in the Republican Party, a group that resisted his candidacy throughout the nominating process.

“In the primaries, there were a lot of small donors, but they weren’t giving to Romney,” Professor Bonica said. “I think it does have something to do with Romney being perceived to be more moderate.”

The Romney campaign’s continuing dearth of small-dollar contributions suggests that very conservative voters, like those who supported Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich, have yet to warm completely to Mr. Romney, which could potentially mean not only less money but also fewer lawn signs and bumper stickers, fewer volunteers and, ultimately, fewer votes.

It is too early to call the problem chronic. The Republican primary was only recently resolved. Mr. Gingrich is expected to drop out of the race officially on Wednesday. Mr. Gingrich, as well as Mr. Santorum and Michele Bachmann, who appealed to more conservative voters, will presumably endorse Mr. Romney eventually. And at that point, conservative Republicans may begin coalescing around Mr. Romney in earnest, enabling his campaign to construct a robust small-donor network.

Small signs of this transition are already apparent. As the Republican primary progressed — and it became clearer and clearer that Mr. Romney would prevail — the cumulative share of his fund-raising coming in checks of less than $200 inched upward, albeit very slightly.

The most recent quarter (January through March) was Mr. Romney’s most successful in terms of small donors. He raised twice as much in donations of less than $200 than in his previous best quarter, the last quarter of 2011. That may be a sign of things to come, as conservatives committed to defeating Mr. Obama come around to supporting Mr. Romney.

“I would expect to see an uptick in the amount of small donations the Romney campaign is getting, but I don’t expect it to be anywhere near Obama’s level,” Mr. Bonica said.


Similar news:
Category: Donations  Tags: ,  Comments off

The worst way to judge a charity

Donating to charity is a worthy action. But which charity? Would it surprise you to know that the criterion that is most often used to decide that question is also the most unreliable? Would it surprise you more to know that many charities are aware of how flawed the criterion is and play it like a violin?

A few months ago a friend of mine who runs an international relief agency phoned me complaining about another charity.

“Do you know what they’re doing?” he fumed. “They’re buying medicine in Canada for 10 cents a pill and booking the American retail cost of the medicine as an in-kind contribution. Do you know the retail value? Seven bucks a pill. They’re padding their in-kind contributions by millions of dollars.”

  • Also
  • Republicans applying 'supply side' theory to benefits

    Republicans applying ‘supply side’ theory to benefits

  • Two views on Social Security

    Two views on Social Security

  • The politics of student loans

    The politics of student loans

  • Kinsley: For whom the bridge tolls

    Kinsley: For whom the bridge tolls

  • Playing politics with student loan interest rates

    Playing politics with student loan interest rates

  • Economists -- you say you want a revolution?

    Economists — you say you want a revolution?

  • See more stories »

    • Fix Social Security, nowGoldberg: Obama’s tainted bundlerBetter than the ‘Buffett rule’McManus: A smaller, smarter militaryLatest economic data don’t fit Obama, Romney narrativesHouse’s Republican pickpockets try again Daum: The Ann Romney trap Ford’s CEO has no regrets about call for bailoutInsurance regulation: Who’re you calling a ‘special interest’?For a healthier economy, fewer Oreos, more granolaThe ‘Buffett rule’ and the difficult path to tax reformTsunami alert: Don’t cut that programThe future of foreclosuresFor Californians, taxes made simpler McManus: The bottom line on taxesBeyond the ‘Buffett rule’IRS form reform: You are what you oweNot their fathers’ economicsA U.S.-Brazil respect deficit ‘Save’ the dollar bill: An idea with no currency at allMcManus: Fuming about gas A federal budget plan, and reality$3 billion in U.S. humanitarian aid buys little respectKinsley: U.S. economic numbers don’t lieBank of America again urges customers to go awayFannie and Freddie drop the ballFannie and Freddie, penny wise and pound foolish?With rivals in Michigan, Obama defends his Detroit bailoutObama’s budget blind spotThe Dow is climbing! The Dow is climbing! McManus: Mixing Medicare and mudslingingNew report finds near-universal irregularities in foreclosuresBursting the GOP’s housing bubble nonsenseThe payroll tax deal isn’t a sign of a more harmonious CongressPaying the tax piperWhat about the U.S. debt?Deficit-reduction numbers from the White House don’t add upCapitol Hill’s cozy insiders A foreclosure deal worth takingRefloating the housing marketObama’s tax code gambitMcManus: Obama’s modest proposal on defenseMcManus: The super committee that wasn’tMcManus: Merkel intent on keeping Eurozone unitedMcManus: Pity the ‘super committee’Daum: Save the nation — buy nowGoldberg: Seduced by the cult of expertsGoldberg: Wake up and smell the teaMcManus: The political angle of the debt-ceiling debateMcManus: Doomsday doubters and the debt ceilingGoldberg: The ideologue in the Oval OfficeMcManus: One good debt debate deserves anotherMcManus: Debt-limit delay in the real worldJonah Goldberg: It’s Obama’s economy, stupidDoyle McManus: The right budget battle to watchDrawing budget battle linesTim Rutten: Paul Ryan’s budget blueprint would push the aged into povertyDoyle McManus: The choice between low taxes vs. Medicare benefitsMichael Kinsley: You can’t cut that

I hung up a little perplexed at first. It wasn’t like the organization was buying pills for a dime and selling them for $7; it was were giving them away. Outside of inflating their donations for bragging rights, I couldn’t see the harm. Then it hit me.

I went to the organization’s website and there it was, one click off the home page: Nearly 90% of its donations in 2011 went directly to the group’s programs. Its administrative costs? Just 5% of the budget. But if the agency was inflating in-kind contributions, it could hike the value of its donations to make its administrative costs seem smaller.

Why would it do that? Because low administrative costs are the holy grail in judging how well a nonprofit does its work. It’s not the only thing responsible raters look at, but it’s the shorthand. The best of the best in one Top 20 list last year, for example, was a charity that spent nothing, nada — 0.0%, as the list put it — on administration. Too bad that as a measure of value, low administrative costs are unscientific and meaningless.

Don’t get me wrong. Low administrative costs could indicate prudence and sound judgment at a charity, but they could just as easily indicate inadequate staffing, insufficient salaries or, shall we say, fudging. Moreover, administrative costs aren’t the primary measurement of for-profit excellence. Are McDonald’s admin costs lower than Wendy’s? Apple’s lower than Microsoft’s?

Why then do we continue to buy such a boneheaded yardstick to measure nonprofit organizations?

Daniel Kahneman, theNobel Prize-winningeconomist, in his brilliant new book “Thinking Fast and Slow,” calls it substitution. Each of us, Kahneman writes, has in effect two systems of thinking — an intuitive system that we rely on for quick answers, hunches and gut reactions, and a rational, statistics-driven intellectual system. As superior as the rational system may seem, it has a flaw: It’s lazy, and it will defer to the intuitive system whenever it can, especially if the intuitive answer comes cloaked in seemingly scientific justification.

On top of that, our intuitive thinking system also hates hard work, Kahneman says, and if figuring out the answer to a problem is too difficult or complex, we often simply substitute a different, easier answer for the hard work, and we may not even be aware we are doing so.

It is really hard to judge the merits of most nonprofit organizations programmatically. Are people smarter, healthier, do they drive better, get fewer divorces or smoke less as a direct result of a nonprofit organization’s intervention? These are the questions we should be asking, and there are many who are trying to do just that every day, internally in nonprofits and in universities and research centers across the country.

But our intuitive thinking system wants an answer now, and because we are intuitively inclined to believe that the nonprofit sector is filled with soft, amateurish executives, we latch on to the pseudo-science of administrative costs as a measure of excellence. It’s hogwash; there is absolutely no way of telling that an organization with 5% administrative costs is superior to one with 20% costs based on that criterion alone. In fact, the exact opposite may be true.

Using administrative overhead as a mark of excellence will be a hard habit to break, however. According to the National Center for Charitable Statistics: “For better or worse, the percentage of total expenses going to program costs is the most common measure of nonprofit organizational efficiency. Focus group research has found that donors expect worthy organizations to have low fundraising and administrative costs. Consequently, nonprofits frequently tout their low overhead ratios in their mailings to the donors.” Or on their websites.

There are a lot of great reasons to donate to a charity — competent staff, involved and committed board and volunteers, a well-defined and engaged constituency, and a track record of past success. When you find the right nonprofit, honor it with your time and treasure. But let’s bury the substitute easy answer of administrative costs. That’s no way to choose a charity.

Jack Shakely is president emeritus of the California Community Foundation.


Similar news:
Category: Charities  Tags: ,  Comments off

Fight For Mental Health Clinic Comes To Obama Campaign Headquarters

CHICAGO (CBS) — About four dozen people demonstrated outside Obama campaign headquarters at Prudential Plaza this morning, in an effort to get the president to put pressure on his former chief of staff, Mayor Rahm Emanuel, to change his mind about closing six mental health clinics.

As WBBM Newsradio’s Steve Miller reports, the protest comes on the day four of the six clinics are expected to close. The other two have already closed.

LISTEN: WBBM Newsradio’s Steve Miller reports

“I’m going to keep on fighting, and I’m not going to give up,” said Linda Hatcher, who has been a client of the Woodlawn Mental Health Center, 6337 S. Woodlawn Ave., which is set to close.

The city plan is to consolidate services – reducing the number of clinics from 12 to six – and work with private mental health organizations.

But Hatcher doesn’t like it.

“I’m not going to give up, and I want everybody to know this – even the president, even the mayor – I’m not going to give up. I’m on fire,” Hatcher said. “I’m not a loser. I’m a winner. And I’m not going to give up.”

At the protest, leaders of the advocacy group the Mental Health Movement delivered a letter to the Obama campaign, hoping to get to Mayor Emanuel that way.

“Shame on Rahm Emanuel for possibly hurting the president’s plans for universal health care, by him denying health care to the poor and the mentally ill,” said N’Dana Carter of the Mental Health Movement.

Carter says she is also a client at the Greater Grand Mental Health Center, which is set to stay open as part of the city’s plan to consolidate services.

The plan to close and consolidate clinics would save some $3 million, according to the city.

But patients and advocates have said closing the clinic would cause such a disruption as to end up costing the city money in the long run.

“If these centers close… people who go to these centers describe it as being like a death sentence. So many people rely on their therapists, and closing centers means laying off a number of therapists, caseworkers, and people who get disconnected from the lifesaving treatment that they give,” Toussaint Losier of the Mental Health Movement said earlier this month.

He added that the $3 million in savings will not be realized when the fallout of closing the clinics is taken into account.

“It’s actually going to end up costing the city, the county, the folks here more money to close these clinics, because folks who rely on these services are going to end up slipping through the cracks,” Losier said on April 17.

The protesters recently spent more than a week camping out in an empty lot across from the Woodlawn facility, until police ordered them to shut down the camp. Ten of the protesters were arrested last week on potential charges of criminal trespass to city-owned land.

But some protesters said the city does not actually own the vacant lot where they were camping out.

A couple of weeks earlier, 23 people were arrested outside the clinic, after they barricaded themselves in front of the doors using steel gates, piping and quick-dry cement.

Police used a chainsaw to cut through the barricades and hauled the demonstrators away.


Similar news:

Losing Your Job: How It Affects Your Mental Health

A new study by Connie Wanberg, Associate Dean at the University of Minnesota’s Carlson School of Management and three other academics, takes a look at what happens to people’s mental health when they lose their jobs, and how their mental states fare in the 20 weeks that follow. From a low right after getting laid off, most people experience a steady improvement in their sense of well-being. Then, if they haven’t found a job 10-12 weeks into their search, the trend reverses and they start feeling rejected and depressed.

Wanberg tracked 177 unemployed  people over the course of 20 weeks by sending them weekly online surveys. Those who engaged in more intense job searches exhibited better mental health than those who were more relaxed about looking for work. The researchers measured mental health by asking respondents to rate themselves on a six-point scale in response to questions like, “have you felt downhearted and blue?”

The study underlines what is most difficult about looking for a job. It is a lonely, unpredictable process with no rules, no guarantees, no supervision and a huge amount at stake. As Professor Wanberg writes in the paper, “Looking for a job is an unfolding task that is highly autonomous, self-organized, loosely structured, and ill-defined. Individuals must decide on their own how and how often to search, and they rarely receive feedback about the effectiveness of the job-search activities and the strategies they are using.” In other words, both motivation and reward must come from within. When rejections start to pile up, it can be incredibly difficult to keep slugging.

One intriguing statistic from the study: Though career professionals say that job seekers should treat their search like a full-time job, participants in the study spent only 17 hours a week on their search at the outset. That declined to 14 hours a week at week 15, and then ticked up slightly after that. The lesson here, say the researchers: Track the amount of time you spend on your search and bump up your effort if you find it lagging.

A piece of good news: even in this depressed job climate, 128 or 72% of the study participants found a job within the 20-week study period.

The biggest lessons from the study: Not only is finding a job in your own hands but so is your mental health, which is directly linked to your ability  to push ahead with your job search. Though looking for a job can be one of the toughest tasks in life, especially when you’re feeling down, it’s incredibly important to soldier on. Remaining jobless and not trying to find work takes a toll on self-esteem and overall mental health. Networking and going on informational interviews is horribly tough when you’re feeling low, but it pays off in self-esteem and ultimately, in your ability to land a job.

As I’ve written many times, job seekers should limit their time online and make an effort to get out and meet people face to face. Most people still find work through people they know.


Similar news:
Category: Mental Health  Tags: ,  Comments off

NZ MP ‘hid Dotcom donations’

Enabling Cookies in Internet Explorer 7, 8 9

  1. Open the Internet Browser
  2. Click Tools Internet OptionsPrivacyAdvanced
  3. Check Override automatic cookie handling
  4. For First-party Cookies and Third-party Cookies click Accept
  5. Click OK and OK

Enabling Cookies in Firefox

  1. Open the Firefox browser
  2. Click ToolsOptionsPrivacyUse custom settings for history
  3. Check Accept cookies from sites
  4. Check Accept third party cookies
  5. Select Keep until: they expire
  6. Click OK

Enabling Cookies in Google Chrome

  1. Open the Google Chrome browser
  2. Click Tools iconOptionsUnder the HoodContent Settings
  3. Check Allow local data to be set
  4. Uncheck Block third-party cookies from being set
  5. Uncheck Clear cookies
  6. Close all

Enabling Cookies in Mobile Safari (iPhone, iPad)

  1. Go to the Home screen by pressing the Home button or by unlocking your phone/iPad
  2. Select the Settings icon.
  3. Select Safari from the settings menu.
  4. Select ‘accept cookies’ from the safari menu.
  5. Select ‘from visited’ from the accept cookies menu.
  6. Press the home button to return the the iPhone home screen.
  7. Select the Safari icon to return to Safari.
  8. Before the cookie settings change will take effect, Safari must restart. To restart Safari press and hold the Home button (for around five seconds) until the iPhone/iPad display goes blank and the home screen appears.
  9. Select the Safari icon to return to Safari.

Similar news:
Category: Donations  Tags: ,  Comments off

Get rid of that old kitchen, support charities through Green Demolitions

Looking for a clean, economical way to take apart your kitchen and make some money off the old fixtures and appliances? Want to donate some of your profits to your favorite charity?/pp If you answered in the affirmative to both of those questions, giving Green Demolitions (http://www.greendemolitions.com/) a look might be worth your while. The company recycles kitchens, appliances, bath fixtures, and just about anything of value from a luxury home, including doors and windows./pp Steve Feldman, a former marketing manager for radio stations in Providence, R.I., founded Green Demolitions seven years ago. Before he got the idea for Green Demolitions, he was notable for his radio station becoming the first independent “Imus in the Morning” syndicated station. A recovering drug and alcohol addict, Feldman left the radio business 14 years ago to “try and give back to the organizations that helped save my life.”/pp In March of 2001 he got the idea for Green Demolitions after driving by a Rockefeller Mansion in Connecticut formerly owned by Farah Palavi, the last Empress of Iran. The mansion, which was in the final stages of being torn down, gave Feldman the idea to recycle and sell the kitchen fixtures in luxury homes, with portions of the profit going to charity. Unfortunately, in a case of bad timing, the economic crisis after the 9/11 attacks would start later that year, delaying the starting date of Feldman’s plan until June of 2005./pp Since then the company has become the premier recycler of luxury kitchens, recycling kitchens across the tri-state area, including such luminaries as political activist Robert Kennedy Jr./pp Green Demolitions began as a pilot program, running only on word of mouth through companies who built and fitted mansions and their customers. That model ran from 2005 until 2008, and was restricted to Fairfield County, Conn., and Westchester County, N.Y./pp “Ninety percent of our donations came through Fairfield County,” Feldman said. “People who hated to see their kitchens being thrown into a dumpster sought us out, and they knew it did some good to bring us in on the project.”/pp Their business would rapidly expand as they expanded geographically, thanks to Dan Schwartz. Schwartz, the CEO of Karl’s Appliances, a regional appliances store in the tri-state area, invited Feldman to expand their operation into New Jersey, much like stores and contractors had referred him back in Connecticut. Green Demolitions put down roots in Fairfield, N.J., opening a 43,000-square foot showroom just a few short miles from Karl’s largest showroom. So far, the Fairfield store is Green Demolitions’ only location, but Feldman said the size of the store made another location unnecessary./pp “Because of the size of the store, we don’t need three stores in three states,” Feldman said. “One store means one environmental footprint, and making it one really good showcase store.”/pp Although he operates a site and store now, Feldman said most of his clients still come through referrals. In a typical week, he gets anywhere between 25 to 50 project proposals. Last year Green Demolitions removed 800 kitchens and had 2,000 prospective buyers of those removed kitchens./pp Feldman recently introduced a sister site to Green Demolitions, called Renovation Angel (http://www.renovationangel.org/). Just a six-week old venture, Renovation Angel’s goal is to reach out to celebrities and super-wealthy homeowners who obtain a resale value of their kitchens over $10,000 to donate a portion of that profit to charity./pp Depending on the kitchen’s value, up to $10,000 total can be raised for charity, which is selected when the project proposal is submitted. The homeowner either can choose a charity of their choice, or one of Renovation Angel’s four non-profit partners./pp Their first celebrity client was “Nurse Jackie” star Edie Falco. Falco chose to donate to Dawn Animal, an agency that provides professional animals to TV and movies, and their cause Sanctuary for Animals, which currently cares for 700 animals./pp “Edie came to our showroom and talked for five and a half hours to us and the media,” Feldman said./pp Former New York Giants wide receiver Amani Toomer became the first “sports angel” for the new venture; Feldman said Toomer’s kitchen will be dismantled in May./pp Green Demolitions also is trying to expand its media appeal with the launch of Renovation Angel; the company is set to appear on a segment of NBC home improvement show “George to the Rescue” May 5 rebuilding a kitchen for charity./pp “We rebuilt the Manhattan YMCA’s kitchen,” Feldman said. “Subzero and Wolf gave us brand new appliances to use. It was made to teach kids how to cook healthy foods.”/pp Feldman added Green Demolitions will appear in an episode of the DIY Network’s “Million Dollar Contractors,” set to air later this year. /pp With Green Demolitions continuing to thrive and Renovation Angel seemingly ready to take off, Feldman has his eyes on expanding out of the Northeast./pp “I want to take this model and replicate in Los Angeles and Chicago,” he said./pp 2012, McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.


Similar news:
Category: Charities  Tags: ,  Comments off

Homewood Human Solutions Launches Health and Wellness Social Media Program

Using social media to meet the informational wellness needs of a mobile generation

TORONTO, April 30, 2012 /PRNewswire/ – Homewood Human Solutions™, an industry leader and pioneer in mental health and addictions, organizational health, and Employee and Family Assistance Programs, is now pioneering the use of social media to provide Canadians with expert and meaningful health and wellness information. This initiative includes a new blogging website – http://www.healthyworkplaces.info – packed with posts and opinions by medical and organizational health experts.

“Fifty-nine percent of adults now use the Internet for health information,” says Craig Thompson, CEO for Homewood Human Solutions.  “While there is a great deal of useful health and wellness information on the Internet, there is also a lot of inaccurate, biased and misleading data and opinions as well.  It’s often difficult to know where to go for expert opinions and accurate facts.”

Research finds that 68 percent of Canadian adults use a general search engine such as Google to research health and wellness topics.  While that may not be so surprising, what is surprising is that they found the second most popular search engine after Google is YouTube.

“Social media sites – YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and blogs—are rapidly replacing traditional sites for accessing health-related information,” says Judith Plotkin, Vice President, Strategic Growth for Homewood Human Solutions. “Research shows that 34 percent of people searching for health-related information use social media.  This figure is much higher with younger adults – the 18 to 24 demographic.  We decided it was time to provide all ages with up-to-date health and wellness information via these social networking platforms.”

Over the past few months, Homewood Human Solutions has been developing and mounting a comprehensive social network presence and today they are actively Twittering, posting on their Facebook page, initiating discussions via their LinkedIn group, and uploading YouTube videos.  From the latest breaking health news to pertinent opinions, from information on national conferences to articles from around the world, from sharing research materials and business cases to voicing opinions, Homewood Human Solutions’ social networking project is gaining in popularity as more and more people and organizations discover their activities.

However, Homewood Human Solutions has not forgotten employers who continue to create healthy workplace cultures where both employees and the organization can thrive – not an easy task in challenging economic times. The Healthy Workplace website is unique in the Employee and Family Assistance Program industry, containing daily posts about mental health and addiction, organizational and employee health and wellbeing, and disability management.  The site also contains blogs by medical and industry experts responding to issues affecting the workplace as well as resources and invitations to free webinars on a wide range of topics.  Users can even choose to receive daily site updates via their email.

“It is about convenience and ease of use,” adds Plotkin. “A growing number of people are accessing online information from their smartphones so the site has been designed with that in mind.  We have optimized web content to make mobile searches simple which is important considering the fact that in just three years there will be 78 million mobile only Internet users globally!”

While the site is of benefit to anyone seeking accurate and timely health information and resources, it has been created primarily to benefit people leaders, human resources professionals and others working in the occupational and organizational health fields. Currently, healthyworkplaces.info contains dozens of posts, blogs, resources and surveys, but soon the site will be fully interactive and people can share information and participate in ongoing discussions on emerging workplace health issues.  It will be a true social media platform providing fully interactive experiences.

Homewood Human Solutions’ online community is located at:

http://www.healthyworkplaces.info

http://www.linkedin.com/company/homewood-human-solutions

http://twitter.com/homewoodhs

http://www.facebook.com/HomewoodHumanSolutions

Homewood Human Solutions™ is a leader in mental health strategies for the workplace and provides Employee and Family Assistance Programs (EFAPs / EAPs), workplace interventions, health promotions, psychological assessments and disability management services. The Company serves over 1,600 organizational clients across Canada and supports over one million employees in managing their health and wellbeing.


Similar news:

Mental health treatment newly available at clinics

New benefits depends on continuation of federal healthcare reform

By Mary Flynn, California Health Report

While the heated national debate about healthcare reform continues, many health communities in California are quietly making changes to prepare for the Affordable Care Act’s implementation. Federal funding is available to help community clinics transition towards what they will resemble in 2014.

One important change that’s taking place: community clinic are moving towards becoming ‘medical homes,’ or centers of care. That means qualifying low-income patients have access to primary care, pharmacy services, or specialty care (by referral). And especially exciting to health specialists is the new availability of mental health and substance abuse services, which are being included at clinics for the first time.

“For years, we separated out those conditions as if they were somehow different from a heart condition or an ulcer or if you have diabetes,” said Leslie Tremaine, the Mental Health Director for Santa Cruz County. “But in fact, what we know is that mind and body are completely connected; “health” needs to incorporate all of those needs.”

Mental health issues affect a significant number of people. According to a 2009 report, an estimated 45 million adults suffer from sort of mental illness each year, including issues with depression or anxiety, but of that population, only approximately 38% of them receive any sort of treatment for mental illness.

In Santa Cruz, behavioral health specialists are now able to seeing patients at community clinics. “Our staff are going to those sites and integrating what we do with what you go to the doctor for,” Tremaine said.

During a check-up, the primary care doctors conducts an assessment that indicates whether a patient is suffering from a mental health issue or has a substance abuse problem. If it appears the patient has a problem, they can seek treatment inside their own clinic.

“The provider can walk down the hall to office and introduce the patient to that clinician right there,” said Lynn Harrison, a Behavioral Health Program Manager. She said it is called a ‘warm handoff,’ and when this introduction happens, it significantly increases the chance the patient will continue to seek care.

Harrison explained that the county does not have enough specialists to staff each of the four clinics full-time, but they try to do a warm handoff as much as possible.

In the past, a patient would have to request an appointment with a mental health or substance abuse specialist for a different date and place. Leslie Tremaine said that simply locating behavioral health clinicians in the same building makes a difference in whether a patient will continue to seek treatment.

“For a lot of people just getting to another place is too confusing or too hard to do, and maybe they’re embarrassed about the idea of having a mental health problem so going to see a ‘shrink’ is something they wouldn’t do,” she said, “But they’d see somebody right inside their own health provider’s office.”

Additionally, unless the person was severely mentally ill, or required psychiatric observation or medication, the cost of the care would not be covered. So those suffering from mild to moderate mental conditions, such as depression or anxiety, would be less likely to receive care.

“We can see people who would otherwise not have been seen or not have met the system of care,” Harrison said.

In the past behavioral health had been largely excluded from patient care, but for Tremaine and other mental health care workers, the future of healthcare reform appears much brighter. “What we’re excited about is that healthcare reform is based on the notion that mental health and substance abuse are part of the whole picture of health,” Tremaine said.

In January of this year, four clinics in Santa Cruz County – MediCruz North County Clinic, MediCruz South County Clinic, Salud Para La Gente, and Santa Cruz Women’s Health Center – began offering a pilot public health program, called Medicruz Advantage, that expanded Medicaid eligibility.

Medi-Cruz is the name given Santa Cruz County’s Medicaid program (while Medi-Cal is the name of California’s Medicaid program). This program, whatever the name, provides necessary health care services for low-income individuals with specific diseases such as breast cancer or HIV/AIDS.

Medi-Cruz Advantage is an expansion of Medi-Cruz where patients no longer need to have a specific condition to receive care. As long as an applicant meets the eligibility requirements – resident of the county, is a legal resident, and has an income at or below 100% of the federal poverty level – they can qualify for comprehensive care.

Leslie Goodfriend, the MediCruz Advantage Manager for Santa Cruz County Health Services Agency, said that before under MediCruz, someone with a specific medical need could apply for care from the county and potentially receive care for specific services related to their condition for a few months.

“It’s what we consider ‘band-aid’ care,” she said.

“The intention behind the medical home is that people can see a doctor, not just when they’re at death’s door or when they have an acute situation, “ she said. The medical home provides patients not only with preventative wellness care, but a primary care person to contact if they have a question or an issue, rather than crowd inside emergency rooms.

”These folks did not have that before,” she said, “and they would certainly not get mental health or substance abuse services.”

The Medicruz Advantage program is not the only one of its kind. In other counties in California, it is called the Low Income Health Program (LIHP), a pilot program between now and 2014 that gives counties an opportunity to see how healthcare reform might work for them.

Fourteen counties have been authorized their own version of the LIHP in California, while another 13 are pending. Eligibility for the program varies from one county to the next, but each is part of the Affordable Care Act’s “bridge to reform” that provides heath coverage to low-income legal residents of California.

Through the program, the federal government matches what the county spends on healthcare. “Where we paid 100% of the cost before, we’d now only pay 50% and get federal reimbursement for the cost,” Tremaine said.

“The feds have made it financially advantageous to participate in the program and that helped us bring some staff on to do this,” she said.

However, whether healthcare reform will continue, and its corresponding flow of federal funding, depends largely on what the Supreme Court decides. Tremaine said that although they will continue to work towards integrating behavioral health with clinical care, access and comprehensive coverage would be hindered by the loss of federal support.

“The whole community benefits when we all have access to health care, and that health care includes mental health and substance abuse,” she said. “Healthy people make healthy communities.”


Similar news:
Category: Mental Health  Tags: ,  Comments off

Obama Enlists Bill Clinton to Draw in Donations for Re-Election

President Barack Obama drew on Bill Clinton’s star power to raise campaign cash yesterday at the
first in a series of joint fundraisers with the former
president.

“You guys are getting two presidents for the price of
one,” Obama told the contributors. “That’s a pretty good
deal.”

Clinton, who four years ago called Obama’s candidacy a
“fairy tale” while campaigning for his wife, Hillary, in the
Democratic primaries, was the featured guest at a dinner and
reception at the McLean, Virginia, home of Terry McAuliffe, a
former Democratic National Committee chairman and fundraiser for
Clinton.

“I ran for president because we had lost our way since
Bill Clinton was in office,” Obama said, praising his
predecessor who presided over an economy that added 22.7 million
jobs during his two terms. Clinton remains popular, with a poll
last year by the Pew Research Center in Washington showing 67
percent of Americans view him favorably.

Clinton is seeking to boost Obama’s fundraising advantage
over presumptive Republican nominee Mitt Romney, who’s
benefitting from well-funded independent committees. He
reinforced the president’s campaign message that Republicans
would return to policies that led to the worst recession since
the Great Depression.

“He’s got an opponent who basically wants to do what they
did before, on steroids,” Clinton said yesterday. “The result
you’ll get is the same, on steroids.”

Fundraising Network

The Obama campaign is seeking to entice more donors with
Clinton and to tap his fundraising network for both his campaign
committee and the independent political action committee, or
super-PAC, supporting the re-election effort.

At the reception, Obama defended his 2010 health-care law,
which would expand health-care coverage to almost all of the
nation’s uninsured. The law is being challenged in the Supreme
Court
with a decision due in late June, less than five months
before the presidential election.

Obama called the law which Romney has vowed to repeal if
elected, “the single most important thing we can do to liberate
our businesses, to make sure our workers are getting wages, and
to free ourselves from crippling debt.”

While Obama had a 10-to-1 campaign cash advantage over
Romney at the start of this month, that ratio drops to almost
two-to-one when the Republican super-PACs are added to Romney’s
arsenal, according to campaign finance reports.

Campaign Cash

At the end of March, the Obama campaign committee, the main
super-PAC that supports him, and the Democratic National
Committee
had $133.6 million in cash compared to $73.6 million
held by Romney, his main support super-PACs, and the Republican
National Committee
, the disclosure records show.

Tickets for yesterday’s dinner for 80 people were $20,000
per person. The reception, for about 500 people, required a
$1,000 donation, according to a campaign official who wasn’t
authorized to discuss the events on the record.

Bill and Hillary Clinton’s network of political donors have
been holding off on multi-million dollar contributions to his
super-PACs until they see the core group of Chicagoans who
backed the president four years ago start donating more.

Through March, only 12 of Obama’s 532 top fundraisers had
donated to Priorities USA Action, the super-PAC created to
support his re-election. Priorities has raised only about $9
million compared with a combined $80 million brought in by the
two main super-PACs dedicated to defeating Obama: American
Crossroads, formed by Karl Rove, and Restore Our Future, a group
backing Romney.

The President will hold his first official campaign rallies
in Columbus, Ohio and Richmond, Virginia, both in battleground
states, on May 5.

To contact the reporter on this story:
Kate Andersen Brower in Washington at
kandersen7@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Steven Komarow at
skomarow1@bloomberg.net

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.


Similar news:
Category: Donations  Tags: ,  Comments off
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Twitter